Proposal:Academic web2
Every proposal should be tied to one of the strategic priorities below.
Edit this page to help identify the priorities related to this proposal!
- Achieve continued growth in readership
- Focus on quality content
- Increase Participation
- Stabilize and improve the infrastructure
- Encourage Innovation
|
Share this:
|
 |
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Proposal:Hire experts and don't allow changes from original. (Discuss) |
|
|
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Proposal:Make institutional adoptation possible. (Discuss) |
|
|
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Proposal:End of the Power games. (Discuss) |
|
|
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Proposal:Embrace professionalism. (Discuss) |
|
|
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Proposal:Expert review. (Discuss) |
Summary
Wikipedia could make better connections to academia who could integrate researches and summaries into it. Articles could be reviewed. This could be possible only if Wikipedia can be used as a working platform based on web2.
Proposal
Currently it is not preferred to cite Wiki as the resource as anyone can change the text and there is no content editor. Wiki can be made better if editing is replaced with list of reviewers that would be credited for such work.
Motivation
Academic motivations but if you employ me I would be happy.
Key Questions
Scientific reliability and accuracy of information.
Potential Costs
Programming costs + preparation for academic standards + curating/networking In addition grants to best student articles.
References
Community Discussion
Do you have a thought about this proposal? A suggestion? Discuss this proposal by going to Proposal talk:Academic web2.
Want to work on this proposal?
- .. Sign your name here!