User talk:Nemo bis/Archive

In other languages: беларуская (тарашкевіца) (be-tarask) български (bg) বাংলা (bn) dansk (da) Deutsch (de) Ελληνικά (el) English (en) Esperanto (eo) español (es) euskara (eu) fil (fil) français (fr) Frysk (fy) עברית (he) हिन्दी (hi) hrvatski (hr) Bahasa Indonesia (id) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) 한국어 (ko) ქართული (ka) Ripoarisch (ksh) latviešu (lv) македонски (mk) Malti (mt) नेपाली (ne) Nederlands (nl) norsk (no) occitan (oc) Kapampangan (pam) polski (pl) português (pt) română (ro) русский (ru) slovenčina (sk) svenska (sv) Tiếng Việt (vi) | Add translation [edit]

Welcome to the Wikimedia Foundation's strategic planning process. We appreciate your interest in taking part. You can start by reading our Community guidelines (en). Check out the links on the Main Page (en) and find an area that interests you. Please feel free to ask me any questions, or you may leave a message on the Village pump (en).

Thanks, by the way, for the great edits you're making! -- Philippe 06:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Cat add

It's been added! I'm going to check on those edit tools, too. Do you have a particular set that you like? -- Philippe 07:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I just asked about it at the wikimedia-tech IRC channel - if they can't do it, I'll file a bugzilla request. :) -- Philippe 07:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Edittools are in. :) I thought we'd leave the full bit, in case someone cared. :) We've also go the advanced toolbar extension in. -- Philippe 07:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Oops! Thanks for pointing out the dup warning. I'm traveling home from the WMF offices today but I'll sit and look at it once I make it back to my home office. -- Philippe 12:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Original Barnstar
		for all the categorization work you've done today! -- Philippe 20:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Cat del

Why do you think Proposal:Tutorials_for_finding_peer-reviewed_secondary_literature isn't a proposal for volunteer support? [1] 75.55.199.5 20:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know: your proposal is not so clear, even if it is very clear in your mind. Expand it. Nemo 21:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Done 99.60.0.26 23:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Also, would you please provide documentation for your assertion that reference desk volunteers object to publication of reference desk services? 75.55.199.5 20:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll try, but that feeling is simply take for granted. Nemo 21:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Isn't it necessarily a subjective opinion of the reference desk volunteers? 75.55.199.5 21:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

No. Nemo 21:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

You have no documentation for a preference that you assert is not an opinion? I see on http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal_talk:Publicize_reference_desk_services_and_article_readership_statistics what you are saying. I wonder if reference desks mature as coverage matures. 99.60.0.26 23:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Merge

Thank you for merging my proposal To advertise means to pay ! I did not know a similar proposal was yet made. Patio 10:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

And for changing the typo of the title of Proposal:Corporate sponsors via corporate pages. I felt like an idiot for doing that.
Re: The merger with Patio's proposal - I've tried to tidy up the merger, can you check that I'm being fair to the spirit of Patio's suggestion? -- 203.171.199.226 13:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, I think he can answer better than me. Nemo 19:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

messaggio senza titotlo

A cosa ti riferisci? Se a questo Proposal:Wikimedia editor non mi sembra che centri molto col mio Proposal:Separate content from style. --Wiso 23:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Geology question

Do you believe the Earth is less than four billion years old? 99.35.129.22 19:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

No, I don't. Why? Nemo 20:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi Nemo, thanks for reminding me to be nice to "newcomers", in a reaction to my remarks about newcomers. Everybody is myopic in his or her own way, sees only his or her own perspective. Everybody who arrived after me is a newcomer ... So if you remark about people being around for four years, yup, newcomers to me. So welcome, you're already around for three years. You've found your way. I love that. And yes, the one big thing we are reminded in this process is that we have a big communication problem. But be realistic, 99,99999% of the readers of the projects didn't complain (post a proposal here). And yes, we have to show newcomers around to let them see what they can find where in a nice way. Dedalus 18:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Next Steps

	Next steps!
	It's time to answer some questions! Would you check out the list of questions that were submitted by the community and others and try to answer some? -- Philippe 01:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Next steps (again)

Hi Nemo bis,

Thanks for all of your contributions to the strategy wiki to date! The strategic planning process wouldn't be where it is today without all of your help. Your early and frequent support was invaluable, and I want you to know how much of a difference that you made. I hope you'll continue to work towards finishing the plan...

We're about to move into the third and final phase of the process, and in many ways, this will be the most challenging. I'm hoping you will continue to be an active presence in shaping the movement's five year strategic plan.

Here are some concrete suggestions as to how you can help moving forward:

• Add your name to Strategic Planning:Hosts. This just formalizes what I think has been true all along; that you care about this process, and that you're doing what you can to help it along moving forward.
• Help organize and improve this wiki! Starting next week (January 18, 2010), we're going to be encouraging many more people to come participate, and we want to make sure this wiki is as presentable as possible. A comprehensive list of things to do is at Strategic Planning:To-do list.
• Invite people to participate! Encourage volunteers to discuss Task force/Recommendations.
• Finally, we need to clearly describe what this final phase is going to look like. In particular, we could use feedback and discussion on Strategic Planning:Decision-Making.

Let me know what you think! Many, many thanks! ~Philippe 00:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)