Reduce Content Gaps and Improve Global Coverage
Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Strategic Plan/Movement Priorities
I'm actually rather fond of the idea behind diverse viewpoints, but maybe it's not expressed well.
What we're looking for is this: we have gaps in our understanding of issues because of the fact that our editing base is largely not diverse - predominately educated young men from the global north. We're missing a diversity of ideas and thoughts on talk pages, for instance, that help us coalesce around a better understanding of topics. Perhaps "point of view" is the wrong verbiage, but I feel pretty strongly that the idea is correct. Can you help me phrase it better?