Let's set a palatable objective
Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Task force/Wikipedia Quality
The wording was deliberate: "aim for 100% of articles to hit it fast".
The kind of criteria we've discussed are reasonably achievable for any article, within minutes or a couple of hours. We should aim for (and communicate we're aiming for) 100%. Not 90%.
We may or may not not get it, but we should aim and drive for it. If we aim for 100% and got 90% I'd be reasonably sure we'd made a difference to quality.