Problematic articles

@ Slrubenstein - apologies, can you explain this post a little differently? I want to be sure I don't misunderstand your focus.

If I understand somewhat, you're discussing here only topics such as natural sciences, medicine, and other topics where high quality peer reviewed material is the norm in the field?

On a side, we host hundreds of thousands of topic in law, house building, beer, military history, scuba resorts, books and newspapers that gain significant coverage, mainstream films, chipsets, and the like. A vast number of topics aren't primarily academic peer reviewed (although they may well have academic input and discussion). Dismissing anything non-academic as "pokemon and D&D characters" is misinformed.

On the English Wikipedia, "problematic articles" are referred to as "controversial," and there are certainly controversies in all fields. Good articles on non-fiction topics are generally considered higher quality than articles about fiction, because it's hard (and often thankless, or worse) work to get controversial non-fiction right. Non-fiction is stenography in comparison.