Possible "major points and findings" (BROAD focus)

I think WikiHow attracts a substantially different class of contributors, because their license forbids commercial re-use of editor contributions. I see that as an unfortunate restriction, so I don't contribute there.

I noted this difference in wikiHow.

For the purposes of understanding how the tool can influence quality, I think wikiHow is an excellent model.

Thanks for the suggestions! Are there others we should consider from the perspective of how tools influence quality? What about other collaborative encyclopedias like Hudong?

Here's the information we currently know about Baidu and Hudong. You may want to pose these questions to the China Task force to see if they have insights or can post screenshots.

Tyler - no, I can't think of any (though I wouldn't be surprised if others have designed them).

As the usage here is pretty specialized I'm inclined to say "don't expect to find examples elsewhere". A bit like Mediawiki itself, it's going to be a "home creation" job. I'm happy to do some mockups if that would help.

I see the taskforce as better in coming up with the ideas on functionality/approach/ethos needed, rather than trying to locate specific exemplars. I think we'd be hard pressed on the latter anyway...