Mike.lifeguard

m:User talk:Mike.lifeguard

relevancy

No big deal, of course, but... just FYI: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relevancy

regarding this diff -- Philippe 05:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that should likely be marked archaic. I spoke too quickly :) Mike.lifeguard | ^@meta 05:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Next Steps

	Next steps!
	It's time to answer some questions! Would you check out the list of questions that were submitted by the community and others and try to answer some? -- Philippe 01:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Renaming questions under "ESP 5 key questions"

Hi. You renamed

• Talk:Emerging_strategic_priorities/ESP_5_key_questions#Would_it_be_possible_to_raise_the_profile_of_Wikimedia_editing_as_bona_fide_voluntary_work.3F
• Talk:Emerging_strategic_priorities/ESP_5_key_questions/Will_Wikimedia_move_away_from_a_centralised_server?_How_about_distributing_server_loads_across_different_volunteers?
• Talk:Emerging_strategic_priorities/ESP_5_key_questions/The_text_of_Wikimedia_is_safe,_based_on_the_large_number_of_people_who_download_the_dumps
• Talk:Emerging_strategic_priorities/ESP_5_key_questions/Wikimedia_Foundation_needs_real_money_to_pay_real_bills.

but you didn't rename the questions in Talk:Emerging strategic priorities/ESP 5 key questions. If you don't rename the questions accordingly people trying to edit from that page get only a #REDIRECT link to edit. I fixed the problem but please remember to change the questions accordingly if you move questions in future. --Fasten 11:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks; I didn't realize it was setup that way :\ Mike.lifeguard | ^@meta 16:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

MediaWiki Skinning

We were prescient in discussing MediaWiki skinning at IRC Office Hours last week. Did you see this post? Exciting news! --Eekim 04:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Bad news: our devs are very frustrated with the skinning system. Good news: they are so frustrated they want to change it :D  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@meta 04:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)