Notafish

In other languages: беларуская (тарашкевіца) (be-tarask) български (bg) বাংলা (bn) dansk (da) Deutsch (de) Ελληνικά (el) English (en) Esperanto (eo) español (es) euskara (eu) fil (fil) français (fr) Frysk (fy) עברית (he) हिन्दी (hi) hrvatski (hr) Bahasa Indonesia (id) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) 한국어 (ko) ქართული (ka) Ripoarisch (ksh) latviešu (lv) македонски (mk) Malti (mt) नेपाली (ne) Nederlands (nl) norsk (no) occitan (oc) Kapampangan (pam) polski (pl) português (pt) română (ro) русский (ru) slovenčina (sk) svenska (sv) Tiếng Việt (vi) | Add translation [edit]

Welcome to the Wikimedia Foundation's strategic planning process. We appreciate your interest in taking part. You can start by reading our Community guidelines. Check out the links on the Main Page and find an area that interests you. Please feel free to ask me any questions, or you may leave a message on the Village pump.

Gopher65_talk 00:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Delphine. Wish I could say hi to you here in Buenos Aires, but I'm happy I can say hi to you here. :-) Arne's been a good proxy. --Eekim 04:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Impact

Sorry to intrude, but I saw that you asked Phillipe about the template.
Then, the "level of discussion" is about the evolution of the conversation, for example, is able to assemble the essential questions would be a level 1. If unable to answer would be a level 2. If they managed to evolve into a joint idea, 3, solutions for pressing the issue, 4, a model ready for the implementation of that idea, 5. Our somenthing like that. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 01:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

... I think it works that way, people who are discussing what shape is a criterion for discussion, what I have is well defined:

1. The lower level is when there is no discussion, or there is only attack, nothing constructive.
2. The highest level is when there were constructive ideas, with solutions to possible problems, there is already a model ready to be applied in practice and that can be replicated.

All other levels are just steps, seeking out the lowest level, to achieve the highest level. That can be set by the publishers themselves.Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 03:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Next Steps

	Next steps!
	It's time to answer some questions! Would you check out the list of questions that were submitted by the community and others and try to answer some? -- Philippe 01:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Questions for movement roles task force

Hi Delphine -

I've left a few of the mandate questions on the task force page at Talk:Task force/Alliances and Partnerships. I hope members of the task force will go in and start to work on these questions - our due dates are actually starting to be a little scary! Thanks... -- Philippe 17:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Strategy Task Force

Very glad to see you joined, Delphine. :-) This is going to be fun! --Eekim 15:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I'll miss you in Berlin this time around. :-( I'll see you in Poland, though. In other news, we've had a good few months to discuss the Task Force recommendations, and it's important that we start converging on goals. If you could jump in on the most recent thread, that would be great. Thanks! --Eekim 18:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)